Question 1 of 7
Whose name is the property in?
This is the single biggest factor — legal ownership sets the starting point.
Did you contribute to the deposit or purchase price?
A direct financial contribution to buying the property is strong evidence of an intended share.
Have you contributed to mortgage payments?
Ongoing, regular contributions carry more weight than occasional or one-off payments.
Have you paid for major renovations or improvements?
Think extensions, new kitchens, structural work — not routine maintenance or decorating.
Was there ever a conversation about sharing ownership?
Even an informal or verbal understanding matters — courts can look at what was said, not just what was signed.
Did you give something up because of that understanding?
This is called "detrimental reliance" — e.g. leaving a job, moving cities, not buying your own place, giving up a tenancy.
How long have you lived together in this property?
Duration alone doesn't create a claim, but it's often considered alongside everything else.
Here's what your answers suggest.
Indicative range
—
Indicative range: 0–0% beneficial interest
Why we've said this
Next step
Ready to find out where you really stand?
This tool gives you a starting point. A family law solicitor can look at your actual evidence and tell you what it's really worth pursuing — many offer a fixed-fee first conversation.
Under TOLATA (the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), a court decides beneficial interest case by case, weighing all the evidence together — not by formula. This tool gives an indicative starting point based on common factors courts consider, so you can understand roughly where you stand and what would strengthen your position. It is not a prediction of any court outcome and is not legal advice. If you're facing a real dispute, speak to a family law solicitor — many offer a fixed-fee initial consultation.